Medical Group Management Association (MGMA)  
Tech Talk: IT possibilities, challenges, resources
February, 2006
By James L. Holly, MD, MGMA member and CEO, Southeast  Texas Medical Associates LLP, Beaumont, jholly@jameslhollymd.com 
  
  Southeast Texas Medical Associates LLP (SETMA), is  a midsize, multispecialty practice with almost 40 providers and more than 250  employees.
  
  When SETMA began in 1995, we had no uniformity in  creating, filing or storing medical records. Some physicians dictated patient  records, others handwrote them. Some organized records alphabetically, others  used a numeric system. Our medical record-keeping illustrated all the problems  facing health care in America.
  
  By spring 1997, dictation and filing frustrations  led SETMA leaders to discuss an electronic medical record (EMR) system. To  learn about the technology, the practice's partners attended the MGMA 1997 Annual  Conference in Washington, D.C., which offered programs on evaluating and  purchasing an EMR. We dissected what we learned and returned to Texas  determined to get the technology.
  
  We've got an EMR - now what? 
  
  We selected and purchased a system in 1998, and the  fun began. It was soon obvious that this was going to be harder than we  thought. We had a product, yet still needed a solution to our record-keeping.  But we were resolved to make the technology work for us.
  
  We launched the fully integrated back-office system  on SETMA's third anniversary. Simultaneously, we were developing the EMR  database to support the clinical documentation solution. Today this step is  superfluous, but in 1998, no "out-of-the-box" solution existed. We aimed to  launch the EMR in November, but it would be Jan. 26, 1999, before we would see  our first patient using the EMR.
  
  That day - the longest day in SETMA's history - is  burned into my memory. It began at 3 a.m., entering data into the records of  patients to be seen that day; it ended 16 hours later when the last patient  left.
  
  Implementing the EMR an enormous challenge 
  
  We were told that the best way to implement the EMR  was to limit the schedule of patients and begin with the last patient of the  day. We didn't decrease the schedule and we began with the first patient of the  day. The new technology and our unfamiliarity with the templates slowed us  considerably. We got so far behind that first morning that we reverted to  dictating our notes. In the afternoon, our information technology employees  asked, "You're going to continue dictating, aren't you?" We replied, "No, we're  going back to the EMR."
  
  We finished the afternoon session two hours late.  Four days later, we saw every patient in the clinic using the EMR. Over two  weeks we achieved the same efficiency level we'd had pre-EMR, but with a  growing ability to bring more information and functionality to each patient  encounter.
  
  What did we learn? 
  
  Two simultaneous events define our success with  EMR. The first was our realization that this task was too hard and expensive if  we only succeeded in documenting patient encounters electronically. We had to  bring more knowledge, more data and more analysis to each encounter based on  best practices and random controlled trials.
  
  We began developing EMR functionality to enhance  the quality of patient care, increase patient satisfaction and expand  providers' knowledge and skills. In spring 1999, we adopted electronic patient  management - and the investment of time and money was suddenly worthwhile. The  EMR now allowed: 
  - Capturing       and processing data, focusing on the development of disease; 
 
  - Auditing       efforts to change those disease processes; 
 
  - Measuring       the effectiveness of those efforts over time; and 
 
  - Evaluating       the quality of patient care at the point of care. 
 
 
The second event - in May 1999 - set the tone for  the next six years of EMR implementation. In a moment of frustration with the  EMR, which at this point was cumbersome to use and yielded little more than an  acceptable record of a patient encounter, one partner said, "We haven't even  begun to crawl yet." SETMA's CEO replied, "Yes, and if a year from now we're  still operating at this level, I'll join you in your complaint. But I'm  celebrating the fact that we're doing more than ever before."
  
  Celebrating the successes 
  
  Ten principles guided SETMA's development of a  database supporting our goals to: 
  - Pursue       electronic patient management rather than EMR; 
 
  - Bring       to bear on every patient encounter what is known rather than what a       particular provider knows - so a patient won't receive inadequate care       because the treating provider lacks information; 
 
  - Make       it easier to do it right than not do it at all; 
 
  - Continually       challenge providers to improve their performance; 
 
  - Infuse       new knowledge and decision-making tools throughout the organization; 
 
  - Establish       and promote continuity of care with patient education, information and       plans of care; 
 
  - Enlist       patients as partners in their care; 
 
  - Evaluate       patient care and populations of patients longitudinally; 
 
  - Audit       provider performance based on the Consortium for Physician Performance       Improvement Data Sets*; and 
 
  - Create       multiple, integrated disease-management tools to help patients manage       their conditions. 
 
 
A celebratory attitude has given SETMA the resolve  to face hard times. The vision of electronic patient management has given us  direction. We are on a pilgrimage to excellence that will never end.
  
  *A joint venture of  the American Medical Association, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid  Services, and the National Institutes of Health  
SETMA a technology leader
In February, SETMA will receive the Healthcare  Information and Management Systems Society Davies Award of Excellence for the  use and implementation of health care information technology. In 2003, the  practice was named the Microsoft Clinic of the Year "for the most innovative  use of Microsoft-based products and tools in reducing costs, automating  workflow and substantially advancing the healthcare practice through the best  use of Microsoft-based products." Physician Practice magazine named SETMA the  Southwest Regional Clinic of the Year in 2003 and in 2005 named SETMA a  runner-up for national clinic of the year.
  
  Learn more about SETMA's EMR experience at www.jameslhollymd.com. Go to "Your Life Your Health"  and then choose "Medical Records." 
  
			 |